DCFPI Testimony on CM Mendelson's Budget Bills

DCFPI appreciates Chairperson Mendelson for introducing legislation to “end the annual school budget crisis” of unstable and unpredictable initial school budgets that DC Public Schools (DCPS) releases each winter. We have long advocated for the city to adopt more common-sense budgeting practices as a tool to promote educational equity in the District. However, neither bill adequately addresses existing funding inequities or reins in DCPS’s illegal practice of supplanting school budgets with “at-risk” funding. DCPS hurts schools educating high percentages of low-income students—the majority of whom are Black and Latinx—the most with this practice.

Furthermore, the bills, as written, raise more questions than they answer. DCFPI recommends that the Committee of the Whole:

Read More

Henderson: School Budgeting Bills B-24-570 and B24-571

I appreciate and support the idea of funding the needs of schools first, and central office second, as well as the goal of providing budget stability for DCPS schools. I have two main areas of concern regarding the bills. The first is that it is unclear, to me at least, how the provisions of these bills will be affected by or interact with the new DCPS budget formula. DCPS has not been forthcoming with details about the new model, offering too few examples to get a sense of their underpinnings as well as using examples that have no reasonable likeness to an actual DCPS school (their high school example is of a 2,500 student school – Wilson, DC’s largest, has fewer than 2,000). Bill570 is oriented towards UPSFF funding, we don’t know exactly how that fits into the new model.

Transparency and predictability would be helpful qualities of a funding formula, but the formula itself needs to be adequate and equitable, and we don’t know yet that it is either. School support funds also need to be allocated equitably. Having a funding floor for year‐over‐year changes is desirable, but that floor has to be at the level needed to adequately and robustly fund our schools.

Read More

EmpowerEd Testimony School Budget Bills Hearing

Good Afternoon Chairperson and Council Members. Thank you for the opportunity to testify today on the Schools Full Budgeting Amendment Act and the Schools First in Budgeting Amendment Act. We approach this conversation with two important guideposts- how do we provide our schools the stability they need and how do we ensure equitable budgets that truly provide each school community with what that specific community needs. Both of these bills are aimed at the first objective, providing schools more stability, but do not address how to make budgeting more equitable. I must say upfront the timing of this hearing provides a difficult context. DCPS is currently undergoing a process to modify their longstanding budgetary approach with a mixed formula approach that in theory will center equity- but for which we have not yet seen simulations with actual schools. Without that context, it becomes difficult to judge how these separate efforts would interplay with a new budget model and what the ultimate results would be for school communities.

Read More

Alpert Ward 2 Ed Council Testimony on B24-0570 and B24-0571

As a general supporter of executive discretion, in theory, I think budgets should be formed by DCPS with input from principals and parents. But the way schools cower in fear of sudden cuts even during flush times for this city does not work for our schools. Further, the process of rolling out a new budget model over the last year and beyond is so egregious in its secrecy and contempt for the council and for parents that the council must act.

I’d much prefer to work on issues collaboratively with city officials, as opposed to in opposition. That was my strategy for transportation and planning advocacy in the past, and I found it to be an effective one. We want the same things - successful and equitable public education serving the children of DC.

Read More

DC SHAPPE: Council Hearing on the Schools First Budgeting Amendment Act and the Schools Full Budgeting Amendment Act of 2021

support the intent to ensure that DCPS schools are stable, able to expand programming and meet the needs of their students and families. I acknowledge the Council is working to solve a problem that has been persistent.

The first issue before the Council, not dealt with yet, is the way we fund public education effective, efficient and fair? We have policy that does not limit the number of schools, incentivizes families to exit rather than invest and in the name of neutrality does not prioritize its own DCPS system of right.

Today, considering the Schools First Budgeting Amendment Act, It is premature for us to recommend changes of the magnitude recommended without knowing more about the DCPS budgets for this year and thus as proposed in these bills for perpetuity.

Read More

Laura Fuchs Council Testimony Bill 24-570 “Schools First in Budgeting Amendment Act of 2021” and Bill 24-571 “Schools Full Budgeting Amendment Act of 2021”

We have said it before and clearly we will have to say it again: Budgets are moral documents and are the foundation upon which our education programming is built. It is simply not possible to achieve our ambitious and important equity goals without equitable funding. And as we have seen time and time again, equity cannot be achieved if left up solely to a Mayor and their central office team – it must be inclusive of the stakeholders and those who are actually implementing the policy – and we cannot operate in the dark.

Read More

A DCPS Teacher Who Helped Create RCTs Speaks Out

Ed. Note: What follows is an edited interview between DCPS parent Betsy Wolf and a DCPS teacher who helped create RCTs (required curricular tasks) for DCPS. As a condition of this interview, the teacher’s identity remains confidential. DCPS is currently using RCTs as a means of student assessment this school year. But RCTs were created last school year by DCPS specifically to help teachers with virtual instruction, aligned with the use of Canvas. The idea then was to help make online curriculum engaging in a virtual setting. Now, teachers are reporting that RCTs are unhelpful to them, because they do not provide usable feedback and are poorly designed as summative assessments. RCTs also take important instruction time away because DCPS has many other required assessments. Digital inequity just exacerbates these problems: As most DCPS schools do not have a 1:1 student device ratio, many teachers can give RCTs only on paper, then enter the data manually into Canvas. Yet, according to another DCPS teacher who testified during the DCPS budget hearing on November 9, DCPS has spent more than $10 million on the company and electronic system that RCTs use. Read on for a fuller accounting of the steep price of RCTs in our schools.]

Read More

DCFPI Update on School Based Mental Health Ask

$841K in local, recurring dollars:

o The Mayor’s proposed budget includes $5.8 million in DBH’s budget for SBMH - this is enough to fund 83 schools at a lower grant level (83 schools x ~$70,000 = ~$5.8 million)

o CBO grants should be closer to ~$80,000. The ~$80,000 reflects a roughly $10,000 supplement DBH gave to CBOs for Cohorts 1-3 to cover increased costs in FY 2021. This enhancement was made possible by $1.5M in ESSER GEERS funding that the DME gave to DBH.

o We are asking for an additional $841,000 to get CBO grants for Cohort 4 to the right size of ~$80,000 (83 schools x ~$10,000 = ~$841,000)

· $1.5 million in one-time federal dollars:

Read More

Mayor’s FY22 Budget Compared to Digital Equity in DC Education’s Asks

June 2021 Mayor Bowser’s FY22 budget makes significant investments in DCPS for student and teacher devices, as well as technology support and school IT infrastructure. However, there is no mention of a citywide vision or plan to close the digital divide and ensure all residents have access to reliable, high quality internet.

Below we compare the mayor’s proposed budget to our January 2021 recommendations to the mayor.

Read More